How BigchainDB is Decentralized¶
Decentralization means that no one owns or controls everything, and there is no single point of failure.
Ideally, each node in a BigchainDB cluster is owned and controlled by a different person or organization. Even if the cluster lives within one organization, it’s still preferable to have each node controlled by a different person or subdivision.
We use the phrase “BigchainDB consortium” (or just “consortium”) to refer to the set of people and/or organizations who run the nodes of a BigchainDB cluster. A consortium requires some form of governance to make decisions such as membership and policies. The exact details of the governance process are determined by each consortium, but it can be very decentralized (e.g. purely vote-based, where each node gets a vote, and there are no special leadership roles).
If sharding is turned on (i.e. if the number of shards is larger than one), then the actual data is decentralized in that no one node stores all the data.
Every node has its own locally-stored list of the public keys of other consortium members: the so-called keyring. There’s no centrally-stored or centrally-shared keyring.
A consortium can increase its decentralization (and its resilience) by increasing its jurisdictional diversity, geographic diversity, and other kinds of diversity. This idea is expanded upon in the section on node diversity.
There’s no node that has a long-term special position in the cluster. All nodes run the same software and perform the same duties.
MongoDB and RethinkDB have an “admin” user which can’t be deleted and which can make big changes to the database, such as dropping a table. Right now, that’s a big security vulnerability, but we have plans to mitigate it by:
- Locking down the admin user as much as possible.
- Having all nodes inspect admin-type requests before acting on them. Requests can be checked against an evolving whitelist of allowed actions. Nodes requesting non-allowed requests can be removed from the list of cluster nodes.
It’s worth noting that the admin user can’t transfer assets, even today. The only way to create a valid transfer transaction is to fulfill the current (crypto) conditions on the asset, and the admin user can’t do that because the admin user doesn’t have the necessary private keys (or preimages, in the case of hashlock conditions). They’re not stored in the database.